Talk:Potassium

Potassium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Potassium is part of the Alkali metals series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 21, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
December 21, 2016	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Elements Top‑importance

	Chemistry portal This article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Dietary Supplements High‑importance

	Potassium is part of WikiProject Dietary Supplements, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to dietary supplements. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Dietary SupplementsWikipedia:WikiProject Dietary SupplementsTemplate:WikiProject Dietary SupplementsDietary supplement articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Materials Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Information Sources: Some of the text in this entry was rewritten from Los Alamos National Laboratory - Potassium. Additional text was taken directly from USGS Periodic Table - Potassium. Other information was obtained from the sources listed on the main page but was reformatted and converted into SI units.

Semi-protected edit request on 14 November 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change (kalium) to (kalium) to balance like other elements. 2001:EE0:4BC9:11A0:C19F:C86:76EB:92C7 (talk) 04:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Polyamorph (talk) 06:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article should be not protected.

I conclude this as mentioned in title. 2001:EE0:4BC3:440:210F:B0D8:CCFD:2918 (talk) 14:09, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Experience tells that unprotected an article on a school topic is very risky, especially in the middle of the school year. Materialscientist (talk) 12:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you cannot satisfy my fulfillment, would any of you mind changing or modifying the source code for a little words from from Latin kalium to from Latin kalium to ensure its consistency, especially in an encyclopedia? 2405:4802:64A8:D090:71E5:E055:6008:4DEC (talk) 05:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

“Potassium” was semi protected indefinitely on Mother’s Day of 2019 (Sunday, May 12) because of vandalism, according to the edit history. It is also a high-profile article, so it must be semi-protected like all the other articles on well known elements 2603:8080:D03:89D4:F12F:8FF3:F8CF:640E (talk) 21:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 January 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the commercial uses part, under the niche uses section, can you please add a () mentioning the states of each compound ? example: 4 KO2 (s) + 2 CO2 (g) → 2 K2CO3 (s) + 3 O2 (g) feel free to not, if it's too confusing or unnecessary Artin 72 (talk) 22:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Geardona (talk to me?) 00:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request - re etymology

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change the source code from [[wikt:kalium#Latin|kalium]] to {{etymology|la|kalium}} to ensure consistency, like the source code of Sodium, where the code represents as {{etymology|la|natrium}}. Hope you fulfill my request. 2001:EE0:4BCA:FD50:B50C:773B:1A40:16BA (talk) 09:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Change the source code for Sodium too, where is written in a common way to {{etymology|la|natrium}} to maintain its seamless synchronization. 2001:EE0:4BCA:FD50:B50C:773B:1A40:16BA (talk) 09:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) Please come here and help me done my fulfillment. 2405:4802:64C7:BF70:B50C:773B:1A40:16BA (talk) 00:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Your request is not clear. The source code does not contain the string you want changed, and what you want it changed to does not make sense either; neither is it found in the Sodium article. I'm also a bit concerned that your primary concern is not improving the article, but doing some sort of "fulfillment". Bazza (talk) 09:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bazza 7, I'm regrettably sorry if you couldn't satisfy and turn my wish to keep the article looking seamless successfully. What all I meant is to change the source code to keep the code balanced like other chemical articles, which most of them use {{etymology|la|[Latin text]}}, rather than [[wikt:[Latin text]#Latin|[Latin text]]]. See gold, silver, tin, antimony for reference. 2405:4802:64C7:BF70:20BF:895B:4915:B58A (talk) 11:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The request was in proper format. Furthermore, the edit made was seamless and exactly as stated.
— Urro^{[talk][edits]} 17:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See again if that is listed in the article. Regards, 2405:4802:64C7:BF70:20BF:895B:4915:B58A (talk) 11:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have just mentioned the Latin spelling and its root for the chemical element, but nothing changed for other content shown except this one as wanted. 2405:4802:64C7:BF70:20BF:895B:4915:B58A (talk) 11:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done
— Urro^{[talk][edits]} 17:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I see nothing changed. Note for you: Don't break the original format, I want to let you know that to make it proper, simply clear or remove the couple word (from Latin) first, then add the text as requested. Doing so may avoid duplicating and doubling the word (from Latin), which is not grammatical. Therefore, it might become more and more redundant and not getting better.2405:4802:64C7:CFE0:20BF:895B:4915:B58A (talk) 01:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{etymology|la|[Latin text]}} should transfer to from Latin [Latin text]. It plays two roles: mentioning the origin, and the root term. You haven't deleted the word (from Latin) first, so it is duplicated. Be sure to check the preview first before performing any task then. 2405:4802:64C7:CFE0:20BF:895B:4915:B58A (talk) 01:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, the origin of the term is from Neo-Latin, so make yourself determined and insert the code as follow: {{etymology|la|{{lang|la-x-new|kalium}}}}. After that, the input code would result in from Latin kalium. That's it. 2405:4802:64C7:CFE0:20BF:895B:4915:B58A (talk) 02:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again -- Apologies, but it seems my edit was

Undone by another Wikipedian, which is why you see no change. Thus, this edit may be considered controversial or against Wikipedia's Manual of Style. I recommend consulting other users in a discussion and establishing a consensus before making this request again. Thank you!
— Urro^{[talk][edits]} 13:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay, @Urropean, we need to get broad consensus before we go ahead! 2001:EE0:4BC5:F2E0:20BF:895B:4915:B58A (talk) 13:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would, sincerely, open an existing request page (this one, to be honest) again since no one noticed and revised this ongoing discussion. Thus, there were no comments arriving here about whether the Latin root code needs reformatting. 2001:EE0:4BC4:4240:71D2:A29:A5C4:100E (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. M.Bitton (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huge overlap with Potassium in biology

This article has huge overlap with Potassium in biology. Has Biological role (Biochemical function, Homeostasis, Nutrition) each with large overlaps. These Sections here are too large. Could trim each to a couple of sentences and refer to the detail in Potassium in biology ? Rod57 (talk) 14:07, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renal filtration, reabsorption, and excretion

In the first paragraph in the section titled "Renal filtration, reabsorption, and excretion", I believe the amounts listed as mg in the discussion on the kidneys' handling of sodium and potassium, should in fact be g. There is no way that total daily intake of either sodium or potassium is in the mg range, yet replacement of excreted sodium is said to be no more than 1 to 10mg and that of potassium is said to be 1 to 4mg. At least I try (talk) 16:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]