Talk:Distributed Universal Number Discovery

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Time to live#Time to live of IP datagrams|TTL]] The anchor (#Time to live of IP datagrams) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

How do i redirect a search for DUNDi to this article? wkm

See Wikipedia:Redirect for help on creating redirects. --Farside 15:58, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

DUNDI and ITU-T

It is not apparent to me that this entry belongs in category ITU-T recommendations. The specification appears to be an individual submission internet-draft, that has no references to other ITU documents or specifies which ITU, ISO working group produced it. A google of itu.int for this found only a mention in their newslog of external events (e.g. a press release from the organization promoting it). If this is a ITU-T recommendation, the specification would have a name that follows the ITU-T recommendation naming scheme, e.g. E.164, X.500 etc.

--MarkWahl 01:09, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Using PSNT

VOIP providers will benefit in that they will eliminate the need to use PSTN circuit to carry traffic between two VOIP customers.

As far as I know calls between two users who both know that they are using VoIP can skip PSTN entirely. This works for SIP - since H.323 was designed by telco guys it may be diffrent (I do not know H.323). SIP uses identifiers in form somebody@registrar.example.com where somebody can be any string - nicname or number - semantics is up to the registrar. Because of this calls can be estabilished without either party (or server) knowing any sort of telephone number. I suggest to remove the cited sentence, unless somenone corrects it. --Alvin-cs ✉ 22:31, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Distributed Universal Number Discovery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828020004/http://dundi.com/PEERING.pdf to http://dundi.com/PEERING.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041022095833/http://www.dundi.com:80/dundi.txt to http://www.dundi.com/dundi.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]