Talk:South Africa

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the South Africa article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9: 30 days

This article is written in South African English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

South Africa is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 28, 2005.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 2, 2005	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
March 10, 2005	Featured article candidate	Promoted
February 13, 2008	Featured article review	Demoted
June 12, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 31, 2004, May 31, 2005, May 31, 2006, and May 31, 2021.
Current status: Former featured article

Africa Top‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during the "African 10,000 Challenge", which started in 1 September 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

South Africa: PSP SA Top‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Wikipedia Primary School project (assessed as Top-importance).

Countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry

WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy.
Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region.
Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.

Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Economy section

"South Africa is the economic nucleus of Africa the country's economy is the most industrialized and technologically advanced in Africa respectively, and has the largest economy in Africa."

Firstly, there should be a semicolon or maybe a period here to separate the clauses:

"the economic nucleus of Africa[;/.] the country's economy..."

Secondly, this might me being dumb but I think the word "respectively" should be removed, I can't tell what it means or refers to here.

Finally, "and has the largest economy in Africa" doesn't seem grammatically correct in how it's added on at the end of the sentence, but I'm not smart enough to know how to remedy it. So I'll mention that in case anyone wants to fix it but otherwise go ahead and mark this as done if you just do any of the other edits I suggested.

Thank you 2A02:C7E:2F68:AC00:759D:37FC:6313:9019 (talk) 01:53, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally stole a reference from GeoffreyA above me, I don't know how to give it back, I'm sorry 2A02:C7E:2F68:AC00:759D:37FC:6313:9019 (talk) 01:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added {{reflist-talk}} at the end of that section so they show up there. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 05:41, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done PianoDan (talk) 16:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

pre-94 South Africa

should have it own page... like USSR versus the current Russian Federation. Was there any debate? 98.150.89.19 (talk) 08:39, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

civilization state 41.113.184.51 (talk) 05:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. FifthFive (talk) 06:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please insert an internal link on "hominid species" in the first line of the second paragraph to the Wikipedia article "hominidae" for better understanding. Hvris (talk) 11:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 23:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Africa

Zach — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:F9E7:F100:D897:C0EA:1D86:C3F (talk) 22:27, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mokhonoana

The article Mokhonoana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved 15 years. No reliable sources on Google. Run of the mill last name. Not enough information to merge.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 19:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]