Talk:Ingalls Shipbuilding

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Trains: Locomotives Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

This article lacks references.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph of Add a photo of the locomotive model the company built be added to this article.

Untitled

The Pascagoula River flows into the Mississippi Sound... not the Gulf of Mexico. The Gulf of Mexico is seven miles further south beyond the barrier islands.

PJ Doyle —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.238.41.26 (talk) 14:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.238.41.26 (talk)

Moved because you shouldn't edit right at the top of the page so I have moved before all notices. Thanks! MichealH ^{Have I done something wrong?} 18:29, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think this should stay at Ingalls - otherwise you have the ridiculous situation of WWII ships being built by Northrop. Look at the links-to, Northrop Grumman is the oddball not the usual. Stan 06:53, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

More like there needs to be three all-new articles to replace this one. I'll do it next week. -Joseph 13:11, 2004 Jun 26 (UTC)

I was about to make the change, but I'll throw it up here first. Several pages reference Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation. My thought was to redirect those to Ingalls Shipbuilding, but decided to wait pending your reorganization of the topic. There are only five articles pointing to Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation, so it would be fairly easy to just go in and make the correction if Ingalls Shipbuilding is the appropriate name. Ocon 21:33, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Yeah, if you don't mind. I have a bunch of stuff to throw in here. -Joseph 01:23, 2004 Jul 1 (UTC)

More to come. -Joseph 16:22, 2004 Jul 2 (UTC)

Okay, I made the changes to the five pages that linked to Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation. They all link to Ingalls Shipbuilding now. Ocon 19:05, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Just to explain the theory, since the addition of "company"/"corporation"/"Inc." etc is often confusing (especially for subsidiaries), results in article dups, may not be accurate over the organization's entire life, I'll drop it if it's not needed to disambiguate. It almost always reads better in running text too. Stan 22:50, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Takeover

Seems to me that ships that were begun under an independent Ingalls should be attributed to them, that ships begun under Litton should be attributed to "Litton Ingalls," and anything since the NG buyout should be to NGSS. Anyone in disagreement? Perhaps I should start compiling a list of Ingalls/Litton/NGSS ships and sort them out in this manner. -Joseph 03:04, 2004 Aug 20 (UTC)

I have a minor disagreement. I would separate out Ingalls era one era. - and maybe divide into 2 sub-catagories- World War II, and first half of cold war Era. Then I think the Litton, NGSS and HHI era's can remain one catagory. As these last era, with the change there was not a major change in what they were building, or in building methods, simply change in name /ownership. Plus the listing is far from complete, but does does cover major ships of the Litton/ NGSS/ HHI era's. 24.245.105.165 (talk) 17:12, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Pascagoula River flows into the Mississippi Sound... not the Gulf of Mexico. The Gulf of Mexico is seven miles further south beyond the barrier islands.

PJ Doyle —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.238.41.26 (talk) 14:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ingalls Shipbuilding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160405163547/http://shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/2large/active/ingalls.htm to http://www.shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/2large/active/ingalls.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:47, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lha1

When was laha1 ship made 2600:1700:2DD0:8E20:4D3:F676:7532:2881 (talk) 14:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]